Someone in class today said there was no such thing as a middle ground. I never objected more. Things just aren't as simple as right or wrong. I never opened my mouth though. But it got me thinking and now I think maybe she's right. Ground is too concrete. The space between two extremes could never be solid.
She said no circumstances could change whether or not an act was right or wrong. I think she's too close minded. But then I realized maybe I was too. Maybe acts are just right or wrong. Stealing is stealing and killing is killing. But I think their results and motives can also be the opposite. In the end, it's never just the act that is factored in. Will the end justified the means? Evidently. It's in the justice system. If killing is wrong, why does the death sentence sometimes serve justice? It's all very complicated and muddy.
The day wasn't too bad.
Intake:
- sandwich for breakfast (125)
- chips during lunch (200)
- sandwich for lunch (125)
- udon and wontons afterschool (350)
- pasta with chicken and broccoli for dinner (500)
= 1300 ish
I know I should eat less.
No comments:
Post a Comment